catalenamara (catalenamara) wrote,
catalenamara
catalenamara

Casual references to fanfic in mainstream media

I still am amazed at the casual references to fanfic in mainstream media.

Example: The May 5, 2008 issue of TIME magazine has an article about Stephenie Meyer entitled "The Next J.K. Rowling". I hadn't heard of Stephenie before but she writes young adult, chaste, vampire novels. The article had a vampire illo, and being a vampire fan from way back, I read the whole article.

And there it was, a casual reference to fanfic; the article author making the clear assumption that readers of TIME magazine won't need this term defined:

"Her books are big (500-plus pages) but not dense - they have a pillowy quality distinctly reminiscent of Internet fan fiction."

I do like the idea that fanfic is so commonplace it doesn't need to be defined. Still not too happy about the "pillowy quality" description. I've read a lot of fic that is distinctly un-pillowy, but I do know what they mean. :-)
Tags: fan fiction
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments